ornamental rule for section top
  Rescue and Relief-5 library galleries  


Previous Next


The Barracks
  These policies reflected the board members' particular social vision. Concerned about losing the city's labor force, they soon suspended the issuing of free railroad passes to fire refugees. Similarly, they took better care of certain members of the population than others. The shelter houses were reserved mainly for skilled workers. The Committee on Special Relief looked to the needs of those more genteel fire victims who "were borne in a single night from homes of comfort and plenty into absolute destitution." It was assumed that such people of refinement would have to be found and helped discreetly, since they would be too proud to ask for help.

As for the able-bodied poor, the barracks were good enough--probably better, the Society maintained, than the housing they had lost. The best thing was to get them off relief and back to work as soon as possible. The Society took great care "to detect and defeat imposition" on its charity by such people and "to aid in establishing order by withholding encouragement to idleness," which was a threat to social order. It was determined to "give no aid to any families who are capable of earning their own support," at the same time assuring the productive labor necessary to rebuild the city. It required applicants to fill out various forms if they wanted aid and to supply a reliable reference, such as an employer or minister. Then a "visitor" would check personally on the merits of the case. A labor exchange was set up with the philosophy that "Any man, single woman, or boy, able to work, and unemployed at this time, is so from choice and not from necessity."


previous
Previous
next
Next


  Contents Previous Essay Next Essay

The Great Chicago Fire and the Web of Memory
Copyright © 1996 by the Chicago Historical Society and the Trustees of Northwestern University
Last revised 10-8-96